Economic Analysis of Deer Management with a Focus on Venison Supply Chain Development in and around the New Forest National Park

Award Criteria

The Contract will be awarded on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender to the Authority, based on the evaluation criteria of 20% price and 80% quality. Tenders will be evaluated and assessed using the scoring matrix below. Criteria Weighting Price 20% Quality 80% Sub-weightings for the Quality Criteria are provided below : Section Quality Heading Sub-Weighting A Company Information 0% B Your Approach 40% C Scope of Services 30% D Your Experience / References 30% The following scoring mechanism will be used to allocate points available. Scoring Points Response meets the required standard in all material respects and adds value in some or all of the major requirements 9 - 10 Response meets the required standard in all material respects 7 - 8 Response meets the required standard in most material respects, but is lacking or inconsistent in others 5 - 6 Proposal falls short of achieving expected standard in a number of identifiable respects 3 - 4 Response significantly fails to meet the required standard, contains significant shortcomings or is inconsistent with other responses 1 - 2 Completely fails to meet required standard or does not provide a response 0 Price - with regards to the price evaluation, the lowest accepted (i.e. reasonable) submitted price will be awarded the maximum price score of 20%. Thereafter, each tender will be ranked and scored in accordance with how much more expensive their respective price is compared to the lowest price (e.g. - if it is 50% more expensive than the lowest price, it will be awarded 50% less price points in comparison to the lowest price tender). Quality - weighted scores will be calculated by multiplying the score for each quality criteria by its weighting. The weighted scores will be totalled for each tender. The totals will be normalised so that the normalised highest total will attract the highest Quality score of 80%. There is an overall quality threshold of 6 points. If the summation of the weighted scores under each quality heading is below this figure, then the tender will no longer be considered, regardless of price.

Description

The New Forest National Park Authority, Natural England and Forestry Commission are working together to convene experts and stakeholders to produce a Protected Site Strategy (PSS) and Strategic Action Plan (SAP) for deer management for the New Forest National Park and surrounding area. A critical component of enabling sustainable deer management is the effective utilisation of venison. A well-functioning venison supply chain can help offset management costs, create economic incentives, and support local food systems and rural economies. However, the venison supply chain in and around the New Forest is currently perceived as underdeveloped, with constraints in processing capacity, market access, coordination, and demand. This commission seeks to understand the economics of deer management as a whole system, with a particular focus on the role and potential of the venison supply chain as a key lever for improving outcomes.

Links & Documents