Loading page content…
Loading page content…
Loading contract search results…
Loading contract details…
| Source: | Find a Tender Service (FTS) |
| Notice Type: | Tender notice |
| Buyer: | New Forest National Park Authority |
| Main Category: | Services |
| Procurement Method: | Below threshold - open competition |
| Tender Status: |
| Open |
| Estimated Value (ex. VAT): | £25,000 |
| Estimated Value (inc. VAT): | £30,000 |
| Release Date: | 26 October 2026 |
| Application Deadline: | 20 November 2026 |
| Enquiry Deadline: | 17 November 2026 |
| Award Criteria: | The Contract will be awarded on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender to the Authority, based on the evaluation criteria of 20% price and 80% quality. Tenders will be evaluated and assessed using the scoring matrix below. Criteria Weighting Price 20% Quality 80% Sub-weightings for the Quality Criteria are provided below : Section Quality Heading Sub-Weighting A Company Information 0% B Your Approach 40% C Scope of Services 30% D Your Experience / References 30% The following scoring mechanism will be used to allocate points available. Scoring Points Response meets the required standard in all material respects and adds value in some or all of the major requirements 9 - 10 Response meets the required standard in all material respects 7 - 8 Response meets the required standard in most material respects, but is lacking or inconsistent in others 5 - 6 Proposal falls short of achieving expected standard in a number of identifiable respects 3 - 4 Response significantly fails to meet the required standard, contains significant shortcomings or is inconsistent with other responses 1 - 2 Completely fails to meet required standard or does not provide a response 0 Price - with regards to the price evaluation, the lowest accepted (i.e. reasonable) submitted price will be awarded the maximum price score of 20%. Thereafter, each tender will be ranked and scored in accordance with how much more expensive their respective price is compared to the lowest price (e.g. - if it is 50% more expensive than the lowest price, it will be awarded 50% less price points in comparison to the lowest price tender). Quality - weighted scores will be calculated by multiplying the score for each quality criteria by its weighting. The weighted scores will be totalled for each tender. The totals will be normalised so that the normalised highest total will attract the highest Quality score of 80%. There is an overall quality threshold of 6 points. If the summation of the weighted scores under each quality heading is below this figure, then the tender will no longer be considered, regardless of price. |
| Procurement ID (OCID): | ocds-h6vhtk-07908c |
| Notice Reference: | 101219-2026 |
Ready to bid on this contract?
BidWriter AI writes your tender response in minutes — import this contract in one click.
View Original Notice
Access the full notice on the official portal
The Contract will be awarded on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender to the Authority, based on the evaluation criteria of 20% price and 80% quality. Tenders will be evaluated and assessed using the scoring matrix below. Criteria Weighting Price 20% Quality 80% Sub-weightings for the Quality Criteria are provided below : Section Quality Heading Sub-Weighting A Company Information 0% B Your Approach 40% C Scope of Services 30% D Your Experience / References 30% The following scoring mechanism will be used to allocate points available. Scoring Points Response meets the required standard in all material respects and adds value in some or all of the major requirements 9 - 10 Response meets the required standard in all material respects 7 - 8 Response meets the required standard in most material respects, but is lacking or inconsistent in others 5 - 6 Proposal falls short of achieving expected standard in a number of identifiable respects 3 - 4 Response significantly fails to meet the required standard, contains significant shortcomings or is inconsistent with other responses 1 - 2 Completely fails to meet required standard or does not provide a response 0 Price - with regards to the price evaluation, the lowest accepted (i.e. reasonable) submitted price will be awarded the maximum price score of 20%. Thereafter, each tender will be ranked and scored in accordance with how much more expensive their respective price is compared to the lowest price (e.g. - if it is 50% more expensive than the lowest price, it will be awarded 50% less price points in comparison to the lowest price tender). Quality - weighted scores will be calculated by multiplying the score for each quality criteria by its weighting. The weighted scores will be totalled for each tender. The totals will be normalised so that the normalised highest total will attract the highest Quality score of 80%. There is an overall quality threshold of 6 points. If the summation of the weighted scores under each quality heading is below this figure, then the tender will no longer be considered, regardless of price.
The New Forest National Park Authority, Natural England and Forestry Commission are working together to convene experts and stakeholders to produce a Protected Site Strategy (PSS) and Strategic Action Plan (SAP) for deer management for the New Forest National Park and surrounding area. Effective and sustainable deer management is a critical component of achieving outcomes for nature and is dependent on a skilled and sufficiently resourced workforce. This commission seeks to develop a robust evidence base on current deer management capacity and capability within and supporting the project area geography.
Document pack· 3 files
Pipeline status
Not addedImports the contract into your BidWriter pipeline · Qualify before you commit to bid
Application Deadline
20 November 2026
25 days left
Estimated Value
£25,000
Need help writing this bid?
Our specialists write winning tender responses. Free consultation, no obligation.
Book a free consultation →