Loading page content…
Loading page content…
| Source: | Find a Tender Service (FTS) |
| Buyer: | Transport Focus |
| Main Category: | Services |
| Procurement Method: | Below threshold - open competition |
| Tender Status: | Complete |
| Estimated Value (ex. VAT): | £60,000 |
| Estimated Value (inc. VAT): | £72,000 |
| Release Date: |
Pipeline status
Not addedContract imported automatically · AI writes the response
Application Deadline
15 January 2026
Closed
Estimated Value
£60,000
Need help writing this bid?
Our specialists write winning tender responses. Free consultation, no obligation.
Book a free consultation →| 23 December 2025 |
| Application Deadline: | 15 January 2026 |
| Enquiry Deadline: | 8 January 2026 |
| Contract Start Date: | 1 February 2026 (Estimated) |
| Contract End Date: | 30 April 2026 (Estimated) |
| Contract Duration: | 3 months |
| Award Criteria: | Assessment methodology Tenders will be assessed on the basis of: • Quality and clarity of proposed approach, including appropriateness of methodology and sampling approach (50%) • Relevant expertise and track record (30%) • Value for money (20%) |
| Procurement ID (OCID): | ocds-h6vhtk-05fcce |
| Notice Reference: | 085937-2025 |
View Original Notice
Access the full notice on the official portal
Assessment methodology Tenders will be assessed on the basis of: • Quality and clarity of proposed approach, including appropriateness of methodology and sampling approach (50%) • Relevant expertise and track record (30%) • Value for money (20%)
Specification / deliverables The appointed supplier will work with Transport Focus and SISJ partners to design and deliver qualitative research addressing how BSL users want to receive passenger information across rail environments. If quantitative work is also considered to be feasible, then we would consider also including this. The areas to be covered are: Access and preferences • How BSL users prefer to access information across station, onboard and digital channels. • What constitutes an acceptable and desirable minimum viable product (MVP) for BSL provision. Content and language considerations • Expectations around regional BSL dialects and whether a single "universal" version is acceptable. • Preferences regarding interpreter choice, including lived experience of deafness. • Views on consistency versus localisation of BSL content. Physical and digital delivery • Expectations for placement, prominence and visibility of BSL information within station environments. • Integration with existing screens, boards or digital platforms. Technology and innovation • Perceptions of AI-generated BSL (including avatar-based and hybrid approaches). • Acceptability of AI in different contexts, such as planned information versus disruption. • Expectations around subtitling alongside BSL. User diversity • Based on demographics (age, gender, employment and income, presence of additional disabilities, region and nation, ethnic background), BSL fluency, hearing status, travel confidence, travel frequency and technology comfort. Methodological expectations A qualitative approach is essential. Proposals should demonstrate experience working with the d/Deaf community and may well include, some or all of: • Short desk research to inform fieldwork design. • Engagement with relevant stakeholders or expert organisations (such as BDA, RNID...). • Depth interviews, accompanied journeys, focus groups or online platforms where appropriate. • We would be open to other methods being included including quantitative surveys. Please note that it is essential that all recruitment and fieldwork is conducted using: • BSL-fluent moderation and appropriate interpreting support. • Inclusive and accessible research environments and materials. Deliverables As a minimum, we will require a debrief presentation and a report to our publication standards (probably PowerPoint). Other outputs may be
Document pack· 1 file
Published contracts in the last 12 months
17
total contracts
£880k
total value
£88,000
average contract size
Typical categories