Allanson Street School Windows

Award outcome

Award Criteria

The quality assessment shall comprise evaluation of your responses to the Method Statement questions and the Social Value questions. The quality assessment shall be allocated a total of 35% of the overall marks available. A further breakdown of this 35% is provided below: i) Your response to the Qualitative Method Statement question(s) carries a weighting of 15% of the overall marks available. ii) Your response to Social Value carries a weighting of 20% of the overall marks available. This is split between a quantitative response 10% and qualitative response 10%. All will be scored in accordance with the tables at 3.3. 3.3 SCORING METHODOLOGY 3.3.1 The following scoring methodology shall be used for the Method Statement question(s): Criteria Score Unacceptable. The information is either omitted or fundamentally unacceptable to the Council 0 Poor. The information submitted has insufficient evidence that the requirements can be met and/or does not demonstrate an acceptable level of quality 1 Deficient. The information submitted has minor omissions against the specified requirements and/or demonstrates a limited level of quality/knowledge 2 Satisfactory. The information submitted meet the requirements and/or demonstrates an adequate level of quality/knowledge 3 Good. The information submitted provides good evidence that the specified requirements can be met and demonstrates a good level of quality/knowledge 4

Description

Replacement windows, Allanson Street School. All bids must be received via the Chest: www.the-chest.org.uk

Links & Documents

About St Helens Council

Published contracts in the last 12 months

Similar contracts