Loading page content…
Loading page content…
Yes, you can challenge a UK tender award decision through the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, but you must act within strict time limits—typically 30 days from when you knew or should have known of the grounds for challenge.
Yes, you can challenge a UK tender award decision under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), which provides statutory rights for suppliers to seek judicial review of procurement decisions. However, challenges must be submitted within strict statutory time limits and meet specific legal criteria.
The most crucial factor is timing. Under Regulation 87 of PCR 2015, you must bring a challenge within 30 days of when you knew or should have known of the grounds for challenge. For automatic suspension of the contract award, you must act within 10 days of notification of the award decision. Missing these deadlines typically means losing your right to challenge, regardless of the merit of your case.
The clock starts ticking from when you receive the contract award notice or debriefing letter, whichever comes first. If the contracting authority fails to provide mandatory information in the award notice, an extended limitation period may apply.
Valid grounds for challenge include: - Procedural breaches: Failure to follow the published procurement process or PCR 2015 requirements - Evaluation errors: Incorrect application of award criteria or mathematical errors in scoring - Discrimination: Unfair treatment or breach of transparency principles - Technical specification issues: Requirements that favour particular suppliers or exclude competition unfairly - Conflict of interest: Where decision-makers have undisclosed interests affecting the outcome
Challenges are brought in the High Court (Technology and Construction Court in England and Wales, or Court of Session in Scotland). The process involves:
1. Pre-action steps: Consider requesting a voluntary standstill or attempting resolution directly with the contracting authority 2. Interim relief: Apply for suspension of the contract award to prevent the contract being signed 3. Substantive hearing: Present evidence of the breach and its impact on your tender
Successful challenges can result in: - Ineffectiveness declarations: Rendering the contract void (rare and subject to strict conditions) - Monetary damages: Compensation for bid costs and lost profits - Set aside orders: Requiring re-evaluation or re-running the procurement - Civil financial penalties: Imposed on the contracting authority
Before challenging, carefully assess the strength of your case and potential costs. Legal costs can be substantial, and unsuccessful challengers typically pay both sides' costs. Consider whether the breach materially affected the outcome—technical breaches that didn't influence the result rarely succeed.
Many disputes can be resolved through constructive dialogue with the contracting authority, particularly if you can demonstrate clear procedural errors. Some authorities may agree to voluntary standstills while they review decisions internally.
For lower-value procurements or less complex disputes, consider alternative routes such as complaints to the contracting authority's internal review process, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (for council procurements), or sector-specific regulators.
The key to successful challenges lies in swift action, robust evidence of regulatory breaches, and demonstrating that the breach affected the procurement outcome. Given the complexity and costs involved, seeking specialist legal advice early is essential for evaluating your prospects of success.